Wednesday, April 3, 2013
Assessment
Finally,
since this class is about assessment I learned a lot about assessing students.
I learned about the need for both formative and summative assessment. I also
learned about alternative assessment for students such as ELL’s or students
with learning disabilities. Professor Behrens taught us about a lot of
assessments that we can use in our future classes. I learned summative
assessments such as the QRI, the DRA, the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, the
San Diego Quick, multiple motivation assessments. I’ve also learned about a lot
of formative assessment that I would love to implement in my future classroom.
I loved when Professor Behrens gave us three cups one red, one yellow and one
green. The red cup is when a student needs help immediately, the yellow cup
means that the student might need some help or clarification, and the green cup
means the student understands! I think this is an amazing idea to be able to
monitor your students. You get to see how
they are doing during the actual process; you don’t have to wait until after
the activity is over and graded to see if they understand it or not. Another
formative assessment that Professor Behrens shared with us was the take away
slips, observations, questions, and think-pair-share. We also did brain
dumping, which we wrote down as many things as we could about what we had
learned the previous class; this helped our comprehension, because writing
deepens comprehension! (ESOL 5.1, 5.2,
5.3) (REC 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 3.7, 3.8, 3.9, 3.10, 5.13, 6.10, 6.11)
Differentiating Instruction
I learned a lot about differentiating instruction
from chapter two in our DeVry’s textbook. As a teacher you really are going to
have a wide variety of ability levels. I really noticed this when I was in
service learning. There were a handful of students who were sent to enrichment
because they are gifted, students who are on grade level, and students who are
really struggling. I have spent over 60 hours with these kids so I’ve gotten a
pretty good idea of all the students’ ability levels. I started to get kind of
nervous of how I would deal with this when I’m a teacher. I need to make it
challenging for the kids who are advanced, or else they well get bored. But it also can’t be too hard for the
students who are behind, I need to cater to the needs of these students or else
they will fail. Knowing all of this I
got very overwhelmed, but this chapter helped me gain a better understanding of
how to attack the differentiating needs in a classroom. I learned how tips on
how to differentiate instruction in this chapter. I learned that pretesting is important, it
helps teachers to determine which students know concepts and which don’t. This
can help teachers, because you can pair students who are knowledgeable on the
concepts with students who aren’t. This creates heterogeneous grouping, which
helps comprehension. I also learned that teachers will have to change
strategies and activities for some students because of their abilities or
knowledge. I learned that it’s ok to not have all students doing the same exact
thing. You can provide different activities, and the students can produce
different products. I also learned that it is important to assess the students’
interests and learning styles at the beginning of the year to better understand
your students. This will help you to accommodate to their needs. ESOL (1.1, 2.2, 3.2, 3.3, 4.1, 4.2, 5.3)
(REC 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.6, 3.7, 3.8, 3.9, 5.13, 6.10, 6.11)
Florida Continuous Improvement Model
I also learned about the Florida Continuous
Improvement Model. This model is in
place to ensure that teachers and students strive for success
continuously. The model incorporates
planning, doing, checking and acting. I
think this model really has a lot to do with RED 4519. I think the most
important part of this model is the check portion. The assessment that you
conduct gives you data to analyze to determine if any extra help or if an
intervention is needed. I think this will be really useful model to keep in
mind as a future teacher. I want my students to succeed; I want to be a teacher
who positively impacts my students. I think if I implement this model in my
classroom, my students will succeed and I will succeed as a teacher. I also
learned that this model has a lot to do with RTI (response to intervention). RTI
is used to provide early and well organized help to students who are
significantly behind and struggling. It is important because we want to improve
their academic success so they don’t drop out. For RTI to be possible you need
to frequently monitor your students’ progress. This is where the FCIM comes
into play, for RTI to happen we need to be continuously planning, doing,
checking, and acting. This model is very important for ELL students, because a
lot of ELL students happen to be those behind and struggling students. If we
don’t incorporate RTI into their education they will drop out. ESOL (1.1, 2.2, 3.1, 4.1, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3)
(REC 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.6, 3.7, 3.8, 3.9, 5.13, 6.10, 6.11)
Interactive Whiteboard
Something I loved learning about was the interactive
whiteboard. I’ve been introduced to the interactive whiteboard in many classes.
However, I’ve never been able to use them, my teachers use them in class, but I
was never given an opportunity to. I loved that Professor Behrens asked Josh to
come in and explain the cool features of the interactive whiteboard that we can
use in the future. I was introduced to many features that I later got to play
with and practice using in Professor Behrens classroom. I’m glad I was
introduced to this because now I have a better understanding of how I can use
this in my future classroom. I think the interactive whiteboard will be
beneficial for all students because it is engaging. With Josh’s help I will be
able to use the interactive whiteboard in extremely engaging and interactive
ways. The students will be excited to learn and hopefully it will create memorable
experiences for them. I also think that the interactive whiteboard will be even
more beneficial to ADD and ELL students. It will engage the ADD students, and
it will provide pictures in a fun way which is great for ELL student’s
comprehension. (ESOL 2.2, 3.2, 3.3, 4.1,
4.2) (REC4.6, 4.7, 4.9, 6.10, 6.12)
Tucker Signing
In Professor Behrens class we were introduced to
Tucker signing. Tucker signing gives certain gestures to different letters and
sounds. This process helps students to decode words. I really liked Tucker
signing and would love to use it in my future classroom. Professor Behrens
showed us many videos about Tucker signing and it was easy to see how
beneficial it can be. I loved the video of Professor Behrens teaching it to a
young boy. You could see how fast he learned the signs and how much it helped
him to decode the words she provided. Also, you could see how interested and
excited the boy was to do the signs and figure out these words! I think this
would be really beneficial for students who are not motivated, have ADD, or ELL
students. I think it could be very helpful for ELL students because it includes
gestures, which is an ESOL strategy which helps to deepen comprehension. Plus
decoding and sounds can be hard for ELL students because some languages don’t
have the same sounds as English. I think adding the gestures for letters and
sounds would help them understand while also helping to motivate them! (ESOL 1.1, 2.1, 2.2, 3.2, 4.1) (REC 1.A.1,
1.F.4, 2.A, 4.3, 4.5, 4.6, 4.7, 4.9, 6.2, 6.3, 6.6, 6.10)
Reciprocal Teaching
I learned about Reciprocal Teaching first in RED 3012,
however when it was introduced in RED 4519 I realized I didn’t learn that much
about it! We completed a KWL chart in class about guided reading and reciprocal
teaching. I knew a ton about guided reading because I had to research it a lot
in RED 3012 for my guided reading lesson plan. However, I really couldn’t even
remember what reciprocal teaching was. I am a visual learner, so I learned a
lot about reciprocal teaching from the video that Professor Behrens played in
class. Reciprocal teaching is similar to guided reading, but the students take
turns becoming the “teacher” or leader during reading sessions. They learn how
to discuss books they read through the reading strategies: summarizing,
questioning, clarifying, and predicting. I think this would be really
beneficial for students, they would be actively engaged, and it would deepen
their comprehension. In addition it
would improve their discussion and communication skills. This would need a lot
of teacher guidance and modeling before students will be successful at it. I
think this would also be really beneficial for ELL students so they can work on
communication skills but I do think they might have some difficulty with this
exercise and will need extra modeling. (ESOL
2.2, 2.3, 3.2, 4.1) (REC 1.F.5, 2.E,
2.F.2, 5.3, 5.7, 5.8, 5.9, 5.11, 6.5, 6.6, 6.7, 6.8)
Gradual Release Model
I loved learning about the Gradual Release Model. I
was never sure how to actually teach things to students before I learned about
this. When I did Junior Achievement, I had to teach the students lessons, they
never really went well. I would always try to explain the activity to the
students and they were always confused. I felt like they weren’t really
learning anything. I was actually getting really discouraged and thought maybe
I won’t be a good teacher! But this model would have really helped me with the
Junior Achievement lessons, and will help me in the future. This model gives me
a structure to follow when I’m teaching, to ensure that I’m teaching
explicitly. The gradual release model
is: I do it, we do it, ya’ll do it, and you do it. This allows students to be
properly scaffolded when learning something new. Another thing I think is
really important is that you might have to stay in one section of the gradual
release model for longer than others. When I’m a future teacher, I will use
formative assessment to evaluate whether or not my students need extra time in
a certain part of the Gradual Release Model. I will also realize I need to be
flexible with my planning and schedule, because if students need more time, I
will need to adjust my lesson and the rest of the day accordingly. (REC 2.E, 5.3)
Professional Learning Community
I first learned about PLC’s in RED 3012,
each table became a PLC to help each other along the way. Then I was further
educated about them in RED 4519. In Professor Behrens class we are actually
working together, interacting, and learning from the students in our PLC. It’s not just someone to call if we need help
on an assignment like it was in RED 3012. I thought that the PLC’s deepened my
comprehension of assignments, textbook readings, articles, and classroom
content. As a future teacher I definitely want to incorporate PLC’s into my
classroom. It helps encourage the sociocultural theory. I also think that since
ELL students benefit from heterogeneous grouping, PLC’s may be very useful for
ELL students in your class. They can work together, learn from each other, and
deepen their comprehension of the material. Most ELLs I have had experience
with through service learning do not work well on their own, they get confused,
discouraged, and give up. I think PLC’s would be helpful to keep them on task,
give them confidence, deepen comprehension, and also increases their
communication with peers! (ESOL 2.2,
3.2, 4.1) (REC 1.F.5, 2.E, 5.2, 5.3, 5.7, 5.8, 5.9)
Sustainable Strategies
In Professor Behrens
RED 4519 class I learned about sustainable strategies. Before this class I was
never taught about sustainable strategies. I learned about reading
comprehension strategies in my RED 3012 class to implement before, during, and
after reading, but I had no idea about sustainable strategies. I learned a lot
from Professor Behrens in class, as well as her article, about this.
Sustainable strategies are ways to think, but because it should be able to be
used in multiple disciplines, you will be able to use in your future. As a future teacher, I definitely will want to
incorporate sustainable strategies in my classroom. I want to teach my students meaningful
strategies that can help them in their future. In one of my lesson plans for my RED 3012
class I used a strategy for my guided reading lesson plan that wasn’t
sustainable. In the future I would change this to a strategy that can be used
to help them read text in their other classes as well. Such as a text coding
strategy that can help them better comprehend their textbooks. (REC 2.E)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)